<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Peters Photography blog &#187; Lens Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/tag/lens-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Wildlife photography, shooting tips, videos, equipment reviews, location diaries and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 17:14:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon TC-20EIII with 600 VR, first field test</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2011/04/20/nikon-tc-20eiii-with-600-vr-sample-image/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nikon-tc-20eiii-with-600-vr-sample-image</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2011/04/20/nikon-tc-20eiii-with-600-vr-sample-image/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon TC-20EIII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=6224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve recently got my hands on the Nikon TC-20EIII 2x teleconverter to see how it performs specifically on the 600 and 200-400 VR. There&#8217;s a full test in due course but here&#8217;s a quick sample image and 100%, unsharpened, crop of my first time using it out in the field. I&#8217;ve read quite a few [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2011/04/20/nikon-tc-20eiii-with-600-vr-sample-image/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 24-120 f4 VRII review</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/12/07/nikon-24-120-f4-vr-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nikon-24-120-f4-vr-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/12/07/nikon-24-120-f4-vr-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Dec 2010 19:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 24-120 VR f4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=5588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With Nano coating, a constant f4 and VRII, is the new and improved 24-120 lens really just that? I was never a huge fan of the original 24-120 VR. It was my first non-kit lens and I owned it back when it first came out. But even then, when I was still finding my feet [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/12/07/nikon-24-120-f4-vr-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which Nikon wide angle: 14-24 or 16-35 VR?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/12/01/which-nikon-wide-angle-14-24-or-16-35vr/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=which-nikon-wide-angle-14-24-or-16-35vr</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/12/01/which-nikon-wide-angle-14-24-or-16-35vr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 14-24 v 16-35 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=5393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re in the market for a top end Nikon wide angle zoom, you&#8217;ll have no doubt narrowed it down to either the 14-24 or the 16-35 VR. But which to get? One is legendary in sharpness from f2.8 onwards but the other is a bit cheaper, has more range and VR. But do you [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/12/01/which-nikon-wide-angle-14-24-or-16-35vr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 50mm 1.4 AFS review</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/01/16/nikon-50mm-afs-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nikon-50mm-afs-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/01/16/nikon-50mm-afs-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 50mm 1.4 AFS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm 1.4 afs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=607</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#8217;s here&#8230;I&#8217;d been thinking about getting one of the variations of the &#8216;Nifty Fifty&#8217; for almost as long as I&#8217;ve been in to photography. The AFS update had been a long time coming but it&#8217;s finally here! Mine arrived a while ago so I thought I&#8217;d do a quick review with some sample shots [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/01/16/nikon-50mm-afs-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 200-400 VR + 1.4x TC review</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/12/22/nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/12/22/nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 200-400 VR (5)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I posted my original review/faq on the 200-400 VR didn&#8217;t have a 1.4x TC. However as I now do I thought I&#8217;d follow up the review by talking about my own findings with this combination in real world situations. The shot below was taken at 550mm, max reach for the lens and TC combo [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/12/22/nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 200-400 VR faq</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/10/02/200400vrreview/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=200400vrreview</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/10/02/200400vrreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 200-400 VR (5)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 30 seconds or so the VR starts earning its money&#8230;! My answer to the question, is the 200-400 VR handhold-able? I first saw one of these lenses &#8216;in the metal&#8217; at my friends house years ago and my initial thought was &#8216;That is stupidly big, how could you carry that around all day?&#8216;. And [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/10/02/200400vrreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>First shots &amp; impressions of the 600/4 AFS II</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/01/600firstshot/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=600firstshot</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/01/600firstshot/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 14:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 600mm f4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[600mm f4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My friend recently upgraded his Nikon 600/4 to the new VR version&#8230;he offered me a very good deal on his old one that I just could not say no too&#8230;! I&#8217;ve not had much chance to use it. However I thought I&#8217;d share a couple of my first shots and imperssions so far including one [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/01/600firstshot/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>200-400 + 1.7x TC test</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/13/200-400-17tc/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=200-400-17tc</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/13/200-400-17tc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Nikon 200-400 VR (5)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently visited a newly discovered local nature reserve. Not the greatest weather so thought it would be a good chance to just scout it out. I had tried this lens with the 1.7tc on my old D2x and never had good results, images were always very soft to the point that they didn&#8217;t even [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/13/200-400-17tc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

