<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Richard Peters Photography blog &#187; 200-400 VR</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/tag/200-400-vr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Shooting tips, videos, equipment reviews, location diaries and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:17:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Nikon 200-400 VRII announced &amp; pre-order</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/04/27/new-nikon-200-400-vrii-announced/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/04/27/new-nikon-200-400-vrii-announced/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 16:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Misc News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=3681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take an already legendary lens, add the latest version of VR and some Nano coating and what do you have&#8230;? A great lens made even better! albeit a &#8216;tiny&#8217; bit bigger and heavier (oh, and of course more expensive). Nikon have released a handful of test images, some of which are below, but I&#8217;m not [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/04/27/new-nikon-200-400-vrii-announced/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>200-400 VR bag (CL-L2) recall&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/05/26/cl-l2-recall/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/05/26/cl-l2-recall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 15:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[**Updated &#8211; more information is available**
Nikon have announced a recall on certain versions of the Nikon CL-L2 case that comes with the 200-400 VR. Initially it was just Nikon USA that issued the warning but it is now on the customer service site of Nikon Europe too. If your bag has no &#8216;T&#8217; on the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/05/26/cl-l2-recall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 200-400 VR + 1.4x TC review</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/12/22/nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/12/22/nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 18:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I posted my original review/faq on the 200-400 VR didn&#8217;t have a 1.4x TC. However as I now do I thought I&#8217;d follow up the review by talking about my own findings with this combination in real world situations. The shot below was taken at 550mm, max reach for the lens and TC combo [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/12/22/nikon-200-400-vr-14x-tc-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Female Chaffinch in flight</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/11/24/female-chaffinch/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/11/24/female-chaffinch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 18:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Take one territorial Chaffinch, a cottage in the Scottish Highlands and some persistence&#8230;the result is this little bird, in a big pose that&#8217;s normally over in the blink of an eye.

Shot details
Camera: Nikon D3
Lens: Nikon 200-400 VR (read my review)
Settings: 1/5000 second, f5, ISO1600
I kid you not, this photo is the end result of watching [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/11/24/female-chaffinch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 200-400 VR faq</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/10/02/200400vrreview/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/10/02/200400vrreview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 22:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lens Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=467</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After 30 seconds or so the VR starts earning its money&#8230;! My answer to the question, is the 200-400 VR handhold-able?
I first saw one of these lenses &#8216;in the metal&#8217; at my friends house years ago and my initial thought was &#8216;That is stupidly big, how could you carry that around all day?&#8216;. And I [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/10/02/200400vrreview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nikon 200-400 VR CL-L2 bag, double strap mod.</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/20/nikon200400bagmod/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/20/nikon200400bagmod/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera Bags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equipment Modifications]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love my 200-400 VR, its a fantastic lens in every respect as opinions everywhere will say. However, one thing that is not mentioned is the standard bag (the CL-L2) is just not designed for carrying all that weight for long periods of time. Buying another bag is one solution but as the bag is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/20/nikon200400bagmod/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Spring Lamb, what did you photoshop out?</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/15/spring-lamb-what-did-you-photoshop-out/</link>
		<comments>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/15/spring-lamb-what-did-you-photoshop-out/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 20:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured Photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[200-400 VR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mull]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wildlife Photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wires, a big boot, a canon and even a catapult&#8230;they are some of the light hearted suggestions of what people think could have been removed from my Spring Lamb photo. Another popular question is &#8216;Did you not get bored sitting round for hours waiting for the photo&#8230;?&#8217; Well, read on to see some outtakes and find out the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/08/15/spring-lamb-what-did-you-photoshop-out/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
