<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wimberley MKII (WH-200) Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/</link>
	<description>Shooting tips, videos, equipment reviews, location diaries and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 02:44:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-16777</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 16:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-16777</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Andy, I actually got my own Wimberley from you guys! My review reflected that for quite some time but when I made some edits I took that bit out and have only just realised after reading your comment that I didn&#039;t put it back!! So yes, I can absolutely recommend Bob Rigby, I also picked up my &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/12/gitzo-gt5541-tripod-review/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Gitzo GT 5541 LS&lt;/a&gt; from them as well!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Andy, I actually got my own Wimberley from you guys! My review reflected that for quite some time but when I made some edits I took that bit out and have only just realised after reading your comment that I didn&#8217;t put it back!! So yes, I can absolutely recommend Bob Rigby, I also picked up my <a href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/12/gitzo-gt5541-tripod-review/" rel="nofollow">Gitzo GT 5541 LS</a> from them as well!</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Boardman</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-16770</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Boardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-16770</guid>
		<description>You mention in you informative review that it is hard to get hold of in the UK, we are in fact the authorised UK distributor of Wimberley products and have their items in stock at all times &amp; it is very rare for us not to have an item you may require.Any item purchased from ourselves is covered under warranty as it would be via Warehouse Express as we supply them, any other dealer might not have this cover due to it not comming from ourselves and being GREY IMPORTED.
Hope this helps in users desion when considering a Wimberley head.
Regards
Andy Boardman
Bob Rigby Photographic Ltd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mention in you informative review that it is hard to get hold of in the UK, we are in fact the authorised UK distributor of Wimberley products and have their items in stock at all times &amp; it is very rare for us not to have an item you may require.Any item purchased from ourselves is covered under warranty as it would be via Warehouse Express as we supply them, any other dealer might not have this cover due to it not comming from ourselves and being GREY IMPORTED.<br />
Hope this helps in users desion when considering a Wimberley head.<br />
Regards<br />
Andy Boardman<br />
Bob Rigby Photographic Ltd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pasquier</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-15900</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasquier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 17:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-15900</guid>
		<description>Just got one of these heads - largely influenced by your review - and it is superb - well designed and manufactured - a rarity these days - look forward to taking it out into the field.

PS A Gitzo GT5541 tripod is on order as well - the old Benbo just couldn&#039;t take the strain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just got one of these heads &#8211; largely influenced by your review &#8211; and it is superb &#8211; well designed and manufactured &#8211; a rarity these days &#8211; look forward to taking it out into the field.</p>
<p>PS A Gitzo GT5541 tripod is on order as well &#8211; the old Benbo just couldn&#8217;t take the strain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Nardini</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12738</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Nardini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 19:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12738</guid>
		<description>Richard:
I purchased the WH-200 a month ago and am quite happy with it.  I use it with my D300 for both a recently purchased Nikon 500 f/4 and an older 200-400 f/4 mounted to a Gitzo GT3540LS.  I had been using the 200-400 with Wimberley&#039;s Sidekick on a Markins M20 and was satisfied but had concerns that the 500&#039;s additional weight might make me nervous.  The M20 still comes in handy when using other glass and when using my Apex bean bag---gives me some additional height for the 200-400 and 500 when shooting from the car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard:<br />
I purchased the WH-200 a month ago and am quite happy with it.  I use it with my D300 for both a recently purchased Nikon 500 f/4 and an older 200-400 f/4 mounted to a Gitzo GT3540LS.  I had been using the 200-400 with Wimberley&#8217;s Sidekick on a Markins M20 and was satisfied but had concerns that the 500&#8217;s additional weight might make me nervous.  The M20 still comes in handy when using other glass and when using my Apex bean bag&#8212;gives me some additional height for the 200-400 and 500 when shooting from the car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12351</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12351</guid>
		<description>Think I&#039;ve got it all finalized now thanks :)

The Gitzo tripod is cheaper to buy in the UK (warehouseexpress).  The rest I would ship from the US.

Gitzo GT3530LS Series 3 Systematic Tripod	£409
RRS BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with LR	$455
Sidekick (0.59 kg)				$250
LCF-14: Foot for Nikon 200-400 &amp; 300-VR		$95

Monopod (Manfrotto 681B or Gitzo GM2541)	$TBD
B2-Pro/L: 80mm clamp with dual mount		$87
MH-01 Hi-Capacity Monopod Head			$150
LCF-14: Foot for Nikon 200-400 &amp; 300-VR		$95</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think I&#8217;ve got it all finalized now thanks <img src='http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The Gitzo tripod is cheaper to buy in the UK (warehouseexpress).  The rest I would ship from the US.</p>
<p>Gitzo GT3530LS Series 3 Systematic Tripod	£409<br />
RRS BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with LR	$455<br />
Sidekick (0.59 kg)				$250<br />
LCF-14: Foot for Nikon 200-400 &amp; 300-VR		$95</p>
<p>Monopod (Manfrotto 681B or Gitzo GM2541)	$TBD<br />
B2-Pro/L: 80mm clamp with dual mount		$87<br />
MH-01 Hi-Capacity Monopod Head			$150<br />
LCF-14: Foot for Nikon 200-400 &amp; 300-VR		$95</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOU</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12339</link>
		<dc:creator>LOU</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:20:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12339</guid>
		<description>Hey, Dean:

The LR version bullet proof. I have the Gitzo GS5121LVL leveling base installed, too (adds 2&quot; of height). Highly recommended, as gimbal head for panning, right? Also, for sticthing, you want a panning base. I run the 3530S (now the 3531S). I&#039;m 5&#039;-11&quot;, and this is slightly below eye level at full extension. The LS goes about 8&quot; taller. If you don&#039;t need the height why pay for it?

Verify the lens foot with your lens model. If you have the Nikon 300 2.8 VR (I or II), LCF-14 the correct foot. It fits the 200-400, as well. More dreaming.

You need a clamp for the 234 tilt head, too. RRS competitor, Kirk Enterprises, offers the 234 with a fitted quick release (MPA-1), which won&#039;t twist. It is compatible with RRS plates.http://www.kirkphoto.com/images/MPA1.jpg I had an RRS Pro clamp, and had no problems with twisting. Still, the Kirk product a good solution, and very reasonable in cost, considering you&#039;re getting the whole enchilada.

The RRS MH-01 mono head - as do all their heads - has tongue-and-groove studs that accomplish the same thing, but it will cost about 2x to do the RRS head/clamp. It&#039;s an awesome system, though, with better load rating/action than the 234. If you go with the RRS MH, I recommend the B2-Pro/L clamp. It&#039;s longer than the standard clamp, and works very well with the LCF-14 foot length. Allows better lens fulcrum positioning. Also, I don&#039;t like a lever release on a monopod; too easy to misfire, and down goes your $6K lens. The RRS knob-style is very smooth. Kirk makes great stuff, too. Either vendor will satisfy, but I&#039;m an RRS loyalist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Dean:</p>
<p>The LR version bullet proof. I have the Gitzo GS5121LVL leveling base installed, too (adds 2&#8243; of height). Highly recommended, as gimbal head for panning, right? Also, for sticthing, you want a panning base. I run the 3530S (now the 3531S). I&#8217;m 5&#8242;-11&#8243;, and this is slightly below eye level at full extension. The LS goes about 8&#8243; taller. If you don&#8217;t need the height why pay for it?</p>
<p>Verify the lens foot with your lens model. If you have the Nikon 300 2.8 VR (I or II), LCF-14 the correct foot. It fits the 200-400, as well. More dreaming.</p>
<p>You need a clamp for the 234 tilt head, too. RRS competitor, Kirk Enterprises, offers the 234 with a fitted quick release (MPA-1), which won&#8217;t twist. It is compatible with RRS plates.http://www.kirkphoto.com/images/MPA1.jpg I had an RRS Pro clamp, and had no problems with twisting. Still, the Kirk product a good solution, and very reasonable in cost, considering you&#8217;re getting the whole enchilada.</p>
<p>The RRS MH-01 mono head &#8211; as do all their heads &#8211; has tongue-and-groove studs that accomplish the same thing, but it will cost about 2x to do the RRS head/clamp. It&#8217;s an awesome system, though, with better load rating/action than the 234. If you go with the RRS MH, I recommend the B2-Pro/L clamp. It&#8217;s longer than the standard clamp, and works very well with the LCF-14 foot length. Allows better lens fulcrum positioning. Also, I don&#8217;t like a lever release on a monopod; too easy to misfire, and down goes your $6K lens. The RRS knob-style is very smooth. Kirk makes great stuff, too. Either vendor will satisfy, but I&#8217;m an RRS loyalist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Peters</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12336</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 11:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12336</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yep, if you want quick release the that&#039;s the on to go for (I prefer quick release myself, as you can see from my BH-55 review). Looks like a pretty good gear list you have there!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em><strong>Yep, if you want quick release the that&#8217;s the on to go for (I prefer quick release myself, as you can see from my BH-55 review). Looks like a pretty good gear list you have there!</strong></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12329</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12329</guid>
		<description>Thanks for all the advice.  Much appreciated.  You guys have saved me some money!  

I see RRS do several versions of the BH-55, is this the one I need?

RRS BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with LR

Here is my full purchase list:
Gitzo GT3530LS Series 3 Systematic Tripod	
RRS BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with 
Sidekick					
LCF-14: Foot for Nikon

Manfrotto 681B monopod
Manfrotto 234RC Monopod QR tilt top</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for all the advice.  Much appreciated.  You guys have saved me some money!  </p>
<p>I see RRS do several versions of the BH-55, is this the one I need?</p>
<p>RRS BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with LR</p>
<p>Here is my full purchase list:<br />
Gitzo GT3530LS Series 3 Systematic Tripod<br />
RRS BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with<br />
Sidekick<br />
LCF-14: Foot for Nikon</p>
<p>Manfrotto 681B monopod<br />
Manfrotto 234RC Monopod QR tilt top</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12297</link>
		<dc:creator>Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12297</guid>
		<description>Hello, Dean:

Here in the USA, we &quot;really&quot; love &quot;Really Right Stuff&quot;. They&#039;ll ship anywhere. I&#039;ve used Arca Swiss &amp; Linhoff, and they both disappointed badly. This opened the door to RRS, and I would use NOTHING ELSE. The &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/03/18/review-really-right-stuff-bh-55-ballhead/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;RRS BH-55&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, or BH-40 head would work great. The 55 will handle a 600, as far as that goes. The BH-55 &amp; Wimberly &quot;Sidekick&quot; very robust, and a made-to-order match for the Gitzo 35-- legs. 

Try the Manfrotto 681B monopod. It&#039;s low cost, low weight, very robust &amp; reliable. If you&#039;re considering the monopod for birding, or anything requiring pitching the lens, then Manfrotto offers an inexpensive swivel head, sold as a package with the 681B, I believe. RRS offers their MH monopod head, for a lot more money, but it&#039;s what I have &amp; I love it. 

I wouldn&#039;t spring for a Gitzo mono unless you&#039;re really certain about its future use. The 681B very popular, and for good reason. If you &quot;must&quot; have a Gitzo now, the 2541/&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/11/20/gitzo-3551-monopod/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;3551&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; are very nice carbon units. The aluminum 2341/3350 swell &amp; cheaper. I use the 5541, but I&#039;m now supporting a 400 2.8.

The TC load inconsequential. Also, you&#039;ll need RRS lens plate, or L-foot (LCF-14 for your lens) to use their head/clamp system. Similar to Wimberly, but better, IMO. RRS changes the way you manage your gear set-up routine; far for the better. You can&#039;t go wrong with the RRS solution. Hope this helps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Dean:</p>
<p>Here in the USA, we &#8220;really&#8221; love &#8220;Really Right Stuff&#8221;. They&#8217;ll ship anywhere. I&#8217;ve used Arca Swiss &amp; Linhoff, and they both disappointed badly. This opened the door to RRS, and I would use NOTHING ELSE. The <strong><a href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2010/03/18/review-really-right-stuff-bh-55-ballhead/" rel="nofollow">RRS BH-55</a></strong>, or BH-40 head would work great. The 55 will handle a 600, as far as that goes. The BH-55 &amp; Wimberly &#8220;Sidekick&#8221; very robust, and a made-to-order match for the Gitzo 35&#8211; legs. </p>
<p>Try the Manfrotto 681B monopod. It&#8217;s low cost, low weight, very robust &amp; reliable. If you&#8217;re considering the monopod for birding, or anything requiring pitching the lens, then Manfrotto offers an inexpensive swivel head, sold as a package with the 681B, I believe. RRS offers their MH monopod head, for a lot more money, but it&#8217;s what I have &amp; I love it. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t spring for a Gitzo mono unless you&#8217;re really certain about its future use. The 681B very popular, and for good reason. If you &#8220;must&#8221; have a Gitzo now, the 2541/<strong><a href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/11/20/gitzo-3551-monopod/" rel="nofollow">3551</a></strong> are very nice carbon units. The aluminum 2341/3350 swell &amp; cheaper. I use the 5541, but I&#8217;m now supporting a 400 2.8.</p>
<p>The TC load inconsequential. Also, you&#8217;ll need RRS lens plate, or L-foot (LCF-14 for your lens) to use their head/clamp system. Similar to Wimberly, but better, IMO. RRS changes the way you manage your gear set-up routine; far for the better. You can&#8217;t go wrong with the RRS solution. Hope this helps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2009/06/04/wimberley-mkii-gimbal-head-review/comment-page-1/#comment-12296</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 18:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/?p=1392#comment-12296</guid>
		<description>I forgot to mention, I also intend to use a teleconverter with the 300mm f2.8 if that makes any difference on choice of tripod head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention, I also intend to use a teleconverter with the 300mm f2.8 if that makes any difference on choice of tripod head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
