<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Canon 5D Mk II HD video footage.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/26/5d-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/26/5d-mark/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:27:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Catching up with the Canon 5D Mark II&#8221; &#8211; 1001 Noisy Cameras &#171; Craig Shaw Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/26/5d-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Catching up with the Canon 5D Mark II&#8221; &#8211; 1001 Noisy Cameras &#171; Craig Shaw Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 14:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=771#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] photographer points out in the comment section which lenses were used in the Laforet video. No triple-figures allowed  Pro [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] photographer points out in the comment section which lenses were used in the Laforet video. No triple-figures allowed  Pro [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Garner</title>
		<link>http://www.richardpeters.co.uk/blog/2008/09/26/5d-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Garner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://richardpetersphotography.wordpress.com/?p=771#comment-57</guid>
		<description>Details of the lenses that were used:

    * FD 7.5mm f/5.6 (converted to EF mount) -- really old, no idea
    * EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM -- $1100
    * EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM -- $1000
    * EF 50mm f/1.2L USM -- $1000
    * EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM -- $1000
    * EF 135mm f/2L USM -- $1000
    * EF 200mm f/1.8L USM -- $3000
    * EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM -- $7000
    * EF 500mm f/4L IS USM -- $6000
    * TS-E 24mm f/3.5L -- $1000
    * TS-E 45mm f/2.8 -- $1000</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Details of the lenses that were used:</p>
<p>    * FD 7.5mm f/5.6 (converted to EF mount) &#8212; really old, no idea<br />
    * EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM &#8212; $1100<br />
    * EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM &#8212; $1000<br />
    * EF 50mm f/1.2L USM &#8212; $1000<br />
    * EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM &#8212; $1000<br />
    * EF 135mm f/2L USM &#8212; $1000<br />
    * EF 200mm f/1.8L USM &#8212; $3000<br />
    * EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM &#8212; $7000<br />
    * EF 500mm f/4L IS USM &#8212; $6000<br />
    * TS-E 24mm f/3.5L &#8212; $1000<br />
    * TS-E 45mm f/2.8 &#8212; $1000</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
